CMBS Trust Details Servicing Shifts, Legal Wins for Wells Fargo

TL;DR

**This CMBS trust is a complex web of servicing changes and legal battles, but Wells Fargo's legal wins are a positive signal for the broader market.**

AI Summary

Morgan Stanley Capital I Trust 2016-UBS9, a non-accelerated filer, reported its fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, with no common equity registered under Section 12(b) or 12(g) of the Exchange Act. The trust is a securitization vehicle for commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS), and its 10-K primarily details changes in servicing arrangements and legal proceedings affecting key participants. Notably, the 525 Seventh Avenue and Ellenton Premium Outlets mortgage loans were repaid in October and November 2025, respectively. Effective March 1, 2025, Trimont LLC acquired Wells Fargo Bank, National Association's commercial mortgage servicing business, replacing it as master, primary, and special servicer across various pooling and servicing agreements. Legal proceedings against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. regarding RMBS trusts, including a Phoenix Light SF Limited case dismissed in July 2022 and a Commerzbank AG appeal denied in October 2024, have largely concluded in Wells Fargo's favor. CWCapital Asset Management LLC also faces ongoing litigation, with 2 counts for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment remaining after an October 2020 dismissal of amended claims.

Why It Matters

This 10-K provides critical transparency for investors in the Morgan Stanley Capital I Trust 2016-UBS9 CMBS, detailing significant shifts in servicing responsibilities and the resolution of major legal challenges. The transition of Wells Fargo's servicing business to Trimont LLC, effective March 1, 2025, impacts operational continuity and risk management for the underlying mortgage pool. The favorable outcomes for Wells Fargo in the Phoenix Light and Commerzbank RMBS lawsuits reduce potential liabilities that could indirectly affect the broader financial market's perception of trustee responsibilities. For certificateholders, understanding these changes is vital for assessing the ongoing performance and oversight of their investments in a competitive CMBS landscape.

Risk Assessment

Risk Level: medium — The risk level is medium due to the inherent complexity of CMBS structures and the ongoing legal proceedings against key servicers like CWCapital Asset Management LLC, which still faces 2 counts for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment. While major litigation against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. has largely concluded favorably, the continuous changes in servicing parties, such as Trimont LLC replacing Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as of March 1, 2025, introduce operational risks and potential for disruption in loan management.

Analyst Insight

Investors should closely monitor the performance of Trimont LLC as the new master, primary, and special servicer, effective March 1, 2025, and assess any potential impact on loan resolutions and cash flows. Given the ongoing litigation against CWCapital Asset Management LLC, investors should evaluate the potential for further legal costs or operational distractions that could affect the Twenty Ninth Street Retail mortgage loan.

Financial Highlights

debt To Equity

N/A

revenue

$0

operating Margin

N/A

total Assets

$0

total Debt

$0

net Income

$0

eps

$0

gross Margin

N/A

cash Position

$0

revenue Growth

N/A

Key Numbers

• 2025-12-31 — Fiscal Year End (Reporting period for the 10-K filing)
• 2025-03-01 — Effective Date (Trimont LLC replaced Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as servicer)
• 2025-10 — Repayment Date (525 Seventh Avenue mortgage loan repaid)
• 2025-11 — Repayment Date (Ellenton Premium Outlets mortgage loan repaid)
• 2024-10 — Appeal Denial Date (Second Circuit denied Commerzbank AG's appeal against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.)
• 2023-05 — Appeal Dismissal Date (Phoenix Light SF Limited dismissed its appeal against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.)
• 2020-10-23 — Dismissal Order Date (Court granted motion dismissing amended claims against CWCapital Asset Management LLC)
• 2 — Remaining Counts (Against CWCapital Asset Management LLC for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment)

Key Players & Entities

• Morgan Stanley Capital I Trust 2016-UBS9 (company) — issuing entity
• Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (company) — former master, primary, and special servicer; defendant in RMBS lawsuits
• Trimont LLC (company) — successor master, primary, and special servicer as of March 1, 2025
• CWCapital Asset Management LLC (company) — special servicer facing ongoing legal proceedings
• Phoenix Light SF Limited (company) — plaintiff in RMBS lawsuit against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
• Commerzbank AG (company) — plaintiff in RMBS lawsuit against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
• LNR Partners, LLC (company) — current special servicer for Twenty Ninth Street Retail mortgage loan
• Greystone Servicing Company LLC (company) — current special servicer for Princeton Pike Corporate Center mortgage loan
• Computershare Trust Company, National Association (company) — certificate administrator, custodian, and trustee as of November 1, 2021
• KeyBank National Association (company) — master servicer engaging Berkadia Commercial Mortgage LLC as sub-servicer

FAQ

Risk Factors

• Ongoing Litigation Against Servicers [medium — legal]: CWCapital Asset Management LLC faces ongoing litigation with two counts remaining for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment, following an October 2020 dismissal of amended claims. While major legal proceedings against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. concerning RMBS trusts have largely concluded in their favor, such as the Phoenix Light SF Limited case dismissal in July 2022 and Commerzbank AG's appeal denial in October 2024, the continued litigation against CWCapital presents a potential operational and legal risk.
• Servicer Transition [medium — operational]: Effective March 1, 2025, Trimont LLC acquired Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s commercial mortgage servicing business, replacing it as master, primary, and special servicer. This significant transition in servicing arrangements could introduce operational risks related to the transfer of responsibilities, data, and client relationships, potentially impacting the management and performance of the mortgage pool.
• Mortgage Loan Repayments [low — financial]: The 525 Seventh Avenue mortgage loan was repaid in October 2025, and the Ellenton Premium Outlets mortgage loan was repaid in November 2025. While loan repayments are generally positive, the early or scheduled repayment of significant assets can impact the trust's future cash flows and investment strategy, especially if reinvestment opportunities are limited or less attractive.

Industry Context

The commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) market is characterized by complex legal structures and significant reliance on specialized servicers. The industry is sensitive to interest rate environments, real estate market performance, and regulatory changes. Recent trends include consolidation among servicing firms and ongoing legal scrutiny of past securitization practices.

Regulatory Implications

As a securitization vehicle, the trust is subject to regulations governing financial instruments and disclosures. The transition of servicing rights and ongoing litigation against key participants highlight the importance of compliance and robust legal frameworks within the CMBS industry.

What Investors Should Do

1. Monitor Servicer Performance
2. Assess Impact of Loan Repayments
3. Evaluate Ongoing Litigation Risks

Key Dates

• 2025-03-01: Trimont LLC becomes servicer — Marks a significant change in the operational management of the trust's assets, replacing Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
• 2025-10-31: 525 Seventh Avenue mortgage loan repaid — Represents the return of principal for a significant asset within the trust's portfolio.
• 2025-11-30: Ellenton Premium Outlets mortgage loan repaid — Another key mortgage loan within the trust's portfolio has been repaid.
• 2024-10-31: Commerzbank AG appeal denied — Confirms a favorable legal outcome for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. in a significant RMBS trust-related case.
• 2022-07-31: Phoenix Light SF Limited appeal dismissed — Further reinforces the favorable legal standing for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. in past RMBS litigation.
• 2020-10-23: CWCapital Asset Management LLC claims dismissed — Initial court ruling in a legal proceeding against a current servicer, though some claims remain.

Glossary

Securitization Vehicle

An entity created to pool assets and issue securities backed by those assets. In this case, it pools commercial mortgage loans. (Morgan Stanley Capital I Trust 2016-UBS9 is a securitization vehicle for CMBS.)

Non-accelerated Filer

A company that meets certain criteria (e.g., public float below $75 million) and is therefore subject to fewer SEC filing and disclosure requirements. (Indicates the trust has a lower reporting burden compared to larger public companies.)

Pooling and Servicing Agreement (PSA)

The legal contract that governs the servicing of mortgage-backed securities, outlining the rights and responsibilities of the servicer and the trustee. (Details the arrangements under which the mortgage loans are managed, including the recent change in servicers.)

Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities (CMBS)

Securities backed by pools of commercial real estate loans. (This is the primary asset class managed by the trust.)

Master Servicer

The primary entity responsible for overseeing the mortgage loans, collecting payments, and managing the loan portfolio. (Trimont LLC has taken over this role from Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.)

Primary Servicer

Handles day-to-day loan administration, including collecting payments, escrow, and customer service. (Trimont LLC has taken over this role from Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.)

Special Servicer

Manages defaulted or troubled loans, often involving loan modifications, foreclosures, or other workout strategies. (Trimont LLC has taken over this role from Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.)

Year-Over-Year Comparison

This filing indicates a significant operational shift with Trimont LLC replacing Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as the servicer effective March 1, 2025. Additionally, two key mortgage loans, 525 Seventh Avenue and Ellenton Premium Outlets, were repaid in late 2025, which would likely impact the trust's asset composition and revenue streams compared to the previous year. Legal proceedings against Wells Fargo have largely concluded favorably, but ongoing litigation against CWCapital Asset Management LLC remains a point of attention.

Filing Documents

• msc16ub9_10k-2025.htm (10-K) — 164KB
• msc16ub9_31.htm (EX-31) — 28KB
• msc16ub9_33-1.htm (EX-33.1) — 357KB
• msc16ub9_33-2.htm (EX-33.2) — 1420KB
• msc16ub9_33-3.htm (EX-33.3) — 703KB
• msc16ub9_33-4.htm (EX-33.4) — 3113KB
• msc16ub9_33-5.htm (EX-33.5) — 2773KB
• msc16ub9_33-6.htm (EX-33.6) — 118KB
• msc16ub9_33-7.htm (EX-33.7) — 992KB
• msc16ub9_33-8.htm (EX-33.8) — 92KB
• msc16ub9_33-9.htm (EX-33.9) — 172KB
• msc16ub9_33-10.htm (EX-33.10) — 600KB
• msc16ub9_33-11.htm (EX-33.11) — 626KB
• msc16ub9_33-12.htm (EX-33.12) — 86KB
• msc16ub9_33-22.htm (EX-33.22) — 439KB
• msc16ub9_33-23.htm (EX-33.23) — 264KB
• msc16ub9_33-24.htm (EX-33.24) — 177KB
• msc16ub9_34-1.htm (EX-34.1) — 14KB
• msc16ub9_34-2.htm (EX-34.2) — 11KB
• msc16ub9_34-3.htm (EX-34.3) — 14KB
• msc16ub9_34-4.htm (EX-34.4) — 11KB
• msc16ub9_34-5.htm (EX-34.5) — 10KB
• msc16ub9_34-6.htm (EX-34.6) — 7KB
• msc16ub9_34-7.htm (EX-34.7) — 693KB
• msc16ub9_34-8.htm (EX-34.8) — 10KB
• msc16ub9_34-9.htm (EX-34.9) — 9KB
• msc16ub9_34-10.htm (EX-34.10) — 13KB
• msc16ub9_34-11.htm (EX-34.11) — 10KB
• msc16ub9_34-12.htm (EX-34.12) — 8KB
• msc16ub9_34-22.htm (EX-34.22) — 9KB
• msc16ub9_34-23.htm (EX-34.23) — 89KB
• msc16ub9_34-24.htm (EX-34.24) — 9KB
• msc16ub9_35-1.htm (EX-35.1) — 1896KB
• msc16ub9_35-2.htm (EX-35.2) — 2593KB
• msc16ub9_35-3.htm (EX-35.3) — 1558KB
• msc16ub9_35-4.htm (EX-35.4) — 1806KB
• msc16ub9_35-5.htm (EX-35.5) — 1086KB
• msc16ub9_35-6.htm (EX-35.6) — 232KB
• msc16ub9_35-7.htm (EX-35.7) — 10KB
• msc16ub9_35-8.htm (EX-35.8) — 290KB
• msc16ub9_35-9.htm (EX-35.9) — 2577KB
• msc16ub9_35-10.htm (EX-35.10) — 2224KB
• msc16ub9_35-18.htm (EX-35.18) — 546KB
• msc16ub9_35-19.htm (EX-35.19) — 102KB
• msc16ub9_35-20.htm (EX-35.20) — 191KB
• 0001888524-26-005579.txt ( ) — 28152KB

financial statements

financial statements. Not applicable. Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant's executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to 240.10D-1(b). Not applicable. Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ___ No X non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter. Not applicable. Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Not applicable. Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. Not applicable. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE List hereunder the following documents if incorporated by reference and the Part of the Form 10-K (e.g., Part I, Part II, etc.) into which the document is incorporated: (1)Any annual report to security holders; (2) Any proxy or information statement; and (3)Any prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) or (c) under the Securities Act of 1933. The listed documents should be clearly described for identification purposes (e.g., annual report to security holders for fiscal year ended December 24, 1980). Not applicable. EXPLANATORY NOTES The MSC 2016-UBS9 mortgage pool includes the following mortgage loans, each of which is serviced pursuant to a separate pooling and servicing agreement (each, an "Outside Pooling and Servicing Agreement"):

of Regulation AB

Item 1123 of Regulation AB. The certificate administrator under a pooling and servicing agreement performs various payment administration functions solely for the securitization governed by such pooling and servicing agreement and the mortgage pool securitized pursuant to such pooling and servicing agreement and does not have any obligations with respect to any other transaction. Consequently, the certificate administrator under an Outside Pooling and Servicing Agreement does not participate in the servicing function for purposes of Item 1122 of Regulation AB, nor does it perform the functions of a servicer for purposes of the definition of "servicer" under Item 1101 of Regulation AB or for purposes of Item 1123 of Regulation AB. The operating advisor under a pooling and servicing agreement represents the interests of senior certificateholders in the transaction governed by such pooling and servicing agreement and is responsible for monitoring the performance of the special servicer under such pooling and servicing agreement and producing certain reports to certificateholders relating to the resolution of the mortgage pool securitized pursuant to such pooling and servicing agreement. The operating advisor under a pooling and servicing agreement does not have any obligations with respect to any other transaction and is solely obligated to perform loan reporting functions with respect to the securitization governed by such pooling and servicing agreement. Consequently, the operating advisor under an Outside Pooling and Servicing Agreement neither participates in the servicing function for purposes of Item 1122 of Regulation AB nor performs the functions of a servicer for purposes of the definition of "servicer" under Item 1101 of Regulation AB or for purposes of Item 1123 of Regulation AB. In addition, while the operating advisor under a pooling and servicing agreement has certain reporting obligations in respect of the related mortgage pool, it has no obligation

Financial Statements and

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. Omitted. Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure. Omitted. Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

Controls and Procedures. Omitted. Item 9B. Other Information. None. Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections. None. PART III Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance. Omitted. Item 11.

Executive Compensation

Executive Compensation. Omitted. Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters. Omitted. Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence. Omitted. Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services. Omitted. ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURE ITEMS FOR REGULATION AB Item 1112(b) of Regulation AB, Significant Obligor Financial Information. Not applicable. Item 1114(b)(2) of Regulation AB, Significant Enhancement Provider Financial Information. No entity or group of affiliated entities provides any enhancement or other support for the certificates as described under Item 1114 (a) of Regulation AB. Item 1115(b) of Regulation AB, Certain Derivatives Instruments (Financial Information). No entity or group of affiliated entities provides any derivative instruments for the certificates as described under Item 1115 of Regulation AB. Item 1117 of Regulation AB, Legal Proceedings. The registrant knows of no legal proceeding pending against the sponsors, depositor, trustee, issuing entity, servicer contemplated by Item 1108(a)(3) of Regulation AB, originator contemplated by Item 1110(b) of Regulation AB, or other party contemplated by

(d)(1) of Regulation AB, or of which any property of the foregoing is

Item 1100(d)(1) of Regulation AB, or of which any property of the foregoing is the subject, that is material to security holders, other than as follows: In December 2014, Phoenix Light SF Limited (Phoenix Light) and certain related entities filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging claims against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., in its capacity as trustee for a number of residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) trusts. Complaints raising similar allegations have been filed by Commerzbank AG in the Southern District of New York, IKB International and IKB Deutsche Industriebank (together, IKB) in New York state court, and Park Royal I LLC and Park Royal II LLC in New York state court. In each case, the plaintiffs allege that Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee, caused losses to investors, and plaintiffs assert causes of action based upon, among other things, the trustee's alleged failure to notify and enforce repurchase obligations of mortgage loan sellers for purported breaches of representations and warranties, notify investors of alleged events of default, and abide by appropriate standards of care following alleged events of default. In July 2022, the district court dismissed Phoenix Light's claims and certain of the claims asserted by Commerzbank AG, and subsequently entered judgment in each case in favor of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. In August 2022, Phoenix Light and Commerzbank AG each appealed the district court's decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Phoenix Light dismissed its appeal in May 2023, terminating its case. In October 2024, the Second Circuit denied Commerzbank AG's appeal. In November 2023, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. entered into an agreement with IKB to resolve IKB's claims. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. previously settled two class actions filed by institutional investors and an action filed by the National Credit Union Administration with similar allegations. From time

View Full Filing

View this 10-K filing on SEC EDGAR